tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207789741693789296.post767457210384387862..comments2024-03-28T09:23:46.097-04:00Comments on Cool Math Stuff: Do the Perfect Numbers Deserve Their Title?Ethan Brownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09611695185154134251noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207789741693789296.post-66191474043866462362012-09-25T21:47:41.545-04:002012-09-25T21:47:41.545-04:00I figured it out (I posted the message)2016 is not...I figured it out (I posted the message)2016 is not perfect because it is divisible by 3, 6, 9, 12, and many more multiples of three. Therefore it is an abundant number.....Cool Number.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207789741693789296.post-16165013014179117012012-09-25T21:19:12.790-04:002012-09-25T21:19:12.790-04:00Why isn't 2016 considered a perfect number?
P...Why isn't 2016 considered a perfect number? <br />Proper Factors:1,2,4,8,16,32,63,126,252,504,1008<br />sum = 2016<br /><br />Could it be because 63 is not prime? Yet the definition of perfect numbers simply says that the sum of the proper factors is the number itself.<br /><br />What am I missing????? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207789741693789296.post-48491621709399796072012-09-24T07:44:01.821-04:002012-09-24T07:44:01.821-04:00this seems very confusing .!
cool math 4 kidsthis seems very confusing .!<br /><a href="http://www.mathblaster.com/" rel="nofollow">cool math 4 kids</a>johnpeterjohnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06580993574762339288noreply@blogger.com