Pi fans argue that by changing pi to tau, we would ruin the formula for the area of the circle. It would go from:
A = πr^2 –> A = 1/2τr^2
As you can see, the formula looks a lot sloppier.
Tau-ists rebut this by saying that the proof of this formula requires one to multiply 1/2 by 2πr^2, thus proving the significance of 2π. I mention this a lot, but I have never actually proven it.
Rather than writing out the proof, I think it would make more sense to watch this YouTube video. It made it a lot more interesting for me.
I find this proof fascinating on its own. Also, you may have noticed when the 2π was present and was cancelled out by the 1/2. For the pi vs tau argument, this specific instance can fall to either side.
Rather than writing out the proof, I think it would make more sense to watch this YouTube video. It made it a lot more interesting for me.
I find this proof fascinating on its own. Also, you may have noticed when the 2π was present and was cancelled out by the 1/2. For the pi vs tau argument, this specific instance can fall to either side.
No comments:
Post a Comment